Impacto de la anticoagulación y antiagregación plaquetaria en la anemia y los eventos hemorrágicos y ateroscleróticos de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en estadios 3 y 4 / Impact of anticoagulation and platelet antiaggregation on anaemia and haemorragic events in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4

Introducción y objetivo: Existe controversia sobre el riesgo/beneficio de anticoagular/antiagregar a pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC). Analizamos el impacto de la anticoagulación/antiagregación en pacientes con ERC sobre el riesgo hemorrágico, cardiovascular y la mortalidad. Pacientes y métodos: Se estudió a 232 pacientes (81 controles, 91 anticoagulados y 60 antiagregados) con ERC en estadios 3 y 4, que fueron seguidos durante un tiempo medio de 33,7 ± 14,8 meses. Se recogieron eventos hemorrágicos, cardiovasculares y mortalidad. Resultados: La hemoglobina sérica y los niveles de ferritina fueron significativamente mayores en pacientes controles (hemoglobina 13,7 ± 1,6; 13,3 ± 1,8 y 12,7 ± 1,9g/dl; p = 0,004; ferritina 170 ± 145; 140 ± 138; 105 ± 99μg/l; p = 0,023). Durante el seguimiento hubo 36 eventos hemorrágicos: 4 en pacientes control, 23 en anticoagulados y 9 en antiagregados (log rank 12,5; p = 0,002). En un modelo de Cox ajustado para edad, función renal y niveles de hemoglobina, la anticoagulación aumentó el riesgo de sangrado 4veces (HR 4,180; 1,955-8,937; p = 0,001) y la antiagregación en casi 3veces (HR 2,780; 1,257-6,149; p = 0,012). Se registraron 64 eventos cardiovasculares, 21 de los cuales fueron clasificados como eventos ateroscleróticos: 10 en el grupo de antiagregación, 8 en el grupo control y 3 en el grupo de anticoagulación (log rank: 8,351; p = 0,015). El tratamiento anticoagulante demostró un efecto protector frente al riesgo de padecer eventos ateroscleróticos (HR 0,136; 0,033-0,551; p = 0,005), mientras que el tratamiento antiagregante no lo modificó (HR 1,566; 0,569-4,308; ns). Conclusiones: La anticoagulación y la antiagregación aumentan el riesgo hemorrágico en pacientes con ERC y empeoran la anemia. La anticoagulación disminuye el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares ateroescleróticos en más de un 85% y la antiagregación no lo modifica

Background and objective: There is controversy concerning the risk/benefit of anticoagulation/antiaggregation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We analysed the impact of anticoagulation/antiaggregation on anaemia and haemorrhagic events in CKD patients. Patients and methods: A total of 232 CKD patients stages 3 and 4 were followed during a mean follow-up time of 36.7 ± 11.6 months: 81 patients did not receive any anticoagulation or antiaggregation treatment, 91 received anticoagulation treatment and 60 patients received platelet antiaggregation. Haemorrhagic and cardiovascular events were recorded. Results: Haemoglobin and ferritine levels were significantly higher in patients who did not receive anticoagulation or antiaggregation (Hb 13.7 ± 1.6, 13.3 ± 1.8 and 12.7±1.9g/dl, p=0.004; ferritine 170 ± 145, 140 ± 138, 105 ± 99μg/l, p=0.023). During follow up, 36 haemorrhagic events were registered: 4in the control group, 23 in the anticoagulation group and 9in the antiaggregation group (log rank 12.5; p=0.002). In a Cox model adjusted by age, renal function and haemoglobin levels, the anticoagulation increased the risk of bleeding by 4times (HR 4.180, 1.955-8.937); p=0,001) and antiaggregation by almost 3times (HR 2.780, 1.257-6.149, p=0.012). A total of 64 cardiovascular events were registered, 21 of which were classified as atherosclerotic events: 10 in the antiaggregation group, 8in the control group and 3in the anticoagulation group (log rank: 8.351; p=0.015). Anticoagulation treatment showed a reduction in the risk of atherosclerotic events (HR 0.136, 0.033-0.551, p=0.005) while platelet antiaggregation did not modified this risk (HR 1,566, 0.569-4.308). Conclusions: Anticoagulation and antiaggregation increase haemorrhagic risk in patients with CKD and worsen anaemia. Anticoagulation reduces atherosclerotic events by more than 85% while platelet antiaggregation does not modify this risk

Impact of anticoagulation and platelet antiaggregation on anaemia and haemorragic events in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4. / Impacto de la anticoagulación y antiagregación plaquetaria en la anemia y los eventos hemorrágicos y ateroscleróticos de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en estadios 3 y 4.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is controversy concerning the risk/benefit of anticoagulation/antiaggregation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We analysed the impact of anticoagulation/antiaggregation on anaemia and haemorrhagic events in CKD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 232 CKD patients stages 3 and 4 were followed during a mean follow-up time of 36.7 ± 11.6 months: 81 patients did not receive any anticoagulation or antiaggregation treatment, 91 received anticoagulation treatment and 60 patients received platelet antiaggregation. Haemorrhagic and cardiovascular events were recorded. RESULTS: Haemoglobin and ferritine levels were significantly higher in patients who did not receive anticoagulation or antiaggregation (Hb 13.7 ± 1.6, 13.3 ± 1.8 and 12.7±1.9g/dl, p=0.004; ferritine 170 ± 145, 140 ± 138, 105 ± 99µg/l, p=0.023). During follow up, 36 haemorrhagic events were registered: 4in the control group, 23 in the anticoagulation group and 9in the antiaggregation group (log rank 12.5; p=0.002). In a Cox model adjusted by age, renal function and haemoglobin levels, the anticoagulation increased the risk of bleeding by 4times (HR 4.180, 1.955-8.937); p=0,001) and antiaggregation by almost 3times (HR 2.780, 1.257-6.149, p=0.012). A total of 64 cardiovascular events were registered, 21 of which were classified as atherosclerotic events: 10 in the antiaggregation group, 8in the control group and 3in the anticoagulation group (log rank: 8.351; p=0.015). Anticoagulation treatment showed a reduction in the risk of atherosclerotic events (HR 0.136, 0.033-0.551, p=0.005) while platelet antiaggregation did not modified this risk (HR 1,566, 0.569-4.308). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation and antiaggregation increase haemorrhagic risk in patients with CKD and worsen anaemia. Anticoagulation reduces atherosclerotic events by more than 85% while platelet antiaggregation does not modify this risk.

Hyperuricemia is associated with progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with reduced functioning kidney mass

Background and objectives: Hyperuricemia plays a major role in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many large observational studies have indicated that increased serum uric acid level predicts the development and progression of CKD in some population, however this hypothesis has not been yet studied in patients with reduced renal mass. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Retrospective study with a cohort of 324 patients with reduced renal mass from an outpatient basis, followed during 60 (36-98) months. Demographics variables, cardiovascular factors, concomitant medications, albuminuria and uric acid levels were recorded yearly. The primary endpoint was the annual fall of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by MDRD-4. The sample was divided into three successive groups (A1: patients with fall of eGFR lower than median, A2: greater than median, B: without fall of eGFR). Factors associated and predictors of kidney function decline were analyzed. Results: One hundred and seventy out of 324 patients suffered a fall of eGFR (group A), (median of fall −1.6ml/min/1.73m2/year (−3.0, −0.7)). Male gender, albuminuria>100mg/day and higher pulse pressure were associated to progression in our cohort (group A). Hyperuricemia was more frequent among patients with higher kidney disease progression (group A2) (33% vs 49%, p=0.04) when comparing to lower progression (group A1). Adjusted Cox regression models showed that hyperuricemia, pulse pressure and albuminuria were independent predictors of kidney disease progression (HR 1.67 (1.06-2.63), p=0.023; 1.02 (1.01-1.03), p=0.001 and HR: 2.14 (1.26-3.64), p=0.005, respectively). Kidney disease progression was higher in patients with unilateral renal atrophy or agenesis than nephrectomy (log rank: 7.433, p=0.006). Conclusions: Hyperuricemia is independently associated with kidney disease progression in patients with reduce functioning renal mass (AU)

Introducción: Grandes estudios observacionales han asociado el aumento del ácido úrico sérico con el desarrollo y progresión de ERC. Esta hipótesis no ha sido contrastada en pacientes con disminución de la masa renal. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en 324 pacientes de una consulta externa que se siguieron durante 60 (36-98) meses. Se recogieron anualmente variables demográficas, factores cardiovasculares, fármacos concomitantes, albuminuria y niveles de ácido úrico. El endpoint primario era la caída anual de FGe por MDRD-4. Dividimos la muestra en tres grupos (A1: pacientes con caída del FGe menor que la media, A2: mayor que la media, B: sin caída del FGe). Analizamos los predictores del empeoramiento de la función renal. Resultados: 170 de los 324 pacientes tuvieron caída de FGe (grupo A) (media de caída -1.6ml/min/1.73 m2/año (-3.0, -0.7). Se asociaron con la progresión de ER género masculino, albuminuria > 100mg/d e hipertensión arterial. La hiperuricemia fue más frecuente entre los pacientes con mayor progresión de ER (grupo A2) (33% vs 49%, p=0.04) comparado con los de menor progresión (grupo A1). El modelo de regresión de Cox ajustado mostró que la hiperuricemia, la presión arterial y la albuminuria eran predictores independientes de la progresión de enfermedad renal: HR 1.67 (1.06-2.63), p=0.023; 1.02 (1.01-1.03), p=0.001 y HR: 2.14 (1.26-3.64), p=0.005). La progresión de ER fue mayor en la atrofia o agenesia renal que en la nefrectomía (log rank: 7.433, p=0.006). Conclusión: La hiperuricemia se asocia de forma independiente con la progresión de enfermedad renal en pacientes con masa renal disminuida (AU)

Hyperuricemia is associated with progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with reduced functioning kidney mass.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperuricemia plays a major role in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many large observational studies have indicated that increased serum uric acid level predicts the development and progression of CKD in some population, however this hypothesis has not been yet studied in patients with reduced renal mass. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective study with a cohort of 324 patients with reduced renal mass from an outpatient basis, followed during 60 (36-98) months. Demographics variables, cardiovascular factors, concomitant medications, albuminuria and uric acid levels were recorded yearly. The primary endpoint was the annual fall of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by MDRD-4. The sample was divided into three successive groups (A1: patients with fall of eGFR lower than median, A2: greater than median, B: without fall of eGFR). Factors associated and predictors of kidney function decline were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy out of 324 patients suffered a fall of eGFR (group A), (median of fall -1.6ml/min/1.73m2/year (-3.0, -0.7)). Male gender, albuminuria>100mg/day and higher pulse pressure were associated to progression in our cohort (group A). Hyperuricemia was more frequent among patients with higher kidney disease progression (group A2) (33% vs 49%, p=0.04) when comparing to lower progression (group A1). Adjusted Cox regression models showed that hyperuricemia, pulse pressure and albuminuria were independent predictors of kidney disease progression (HR 1.67 (1.06-2.63), p=0.023; 1.02 (1.01-1.03), p=0.001 and HR: 2.14 (1.26-3.64), p=0.005, respectively). Kidney disease progression was higher in patients with unilateral renal atrophy or agenesis than nephrectomy (log rank: 7.433, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperuricemia is independently associated with kidney disease progression in patients with reduce functioning renal mass.